Find in re Jensen, 995 F.2d at 930 n. 5 ( The new determination off whenever a state comes up to possess purposes of personal bankruptcy legislation will likely be a point of federal personal bankruptcy rules?’ ); Corman v. Morgan (In re Morgan), 197 B.R. 892, 896 (Letter.D.Cal.1996) (finding that dedication regarding whenever a claim comes up underneath the bankruptcy password will be governed because of the federal legislation), aff’d, 131 F.three dimensional 147 (9th Cir.1997); Cohen v. North park Parkside Area Ass’n (During the re Cohen), 122 B.Roentgen. 755, 757 (Bankr.S.D.Cal.1991) (But not, government personal bankruptcy legislation, in place of California county law, controls whenever a debt arises getting reason for deciding dischargeability.); find along with Employees’ Senior years Sys. v. 2d 799, 803-04 (9th Cir.1982) (using federal rules to choose when parties had obligations not as much as indemnification agreement). The new Password talks of a personal debt while the accountability to your a declare. 11 You.S.C. 101(12). The word obligations are therefore coextensive that have [the word good] claim’. Daghighfekr v. Mekhail (When you look at the re Daghighfekr), 161 B.R. 685, 687 (9th Cir. BAP 1993).
Osborne (During the re also THC), 686 F
Pursuant so you can part 101(5)(A), a claim was a beneficial right to commission, although such right are faster so you’re able to wisdom, liquidated, unliquidated, repaired, contingent, matured, unmatured, debated, undisputed, judge, equitable, shielded or unsecured. (importance added). (більше…)